jimswinder Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 George Simmons wrote:If you're referring to the second group he made, look again and you'll see that he first moved those channels into a contiguous position and then created the group.maybe I missing something...but I see him insert a CCD (as a group) and from that CCR he takes Pixels 1, 5, 8, and 11 and makes a group out of them...or are we saying the same but differently? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Simmons Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 jimswinder wrote: maybe I missing something... but I see him insert a CCD (as a group) and from that CCR he takes Pixels 1, 5, 8, and 11 and makes a group out of them...You ARE missing something - the most important step. Look at it again - he copies/moves those four channels to a different place where they're contiguous and THEN he makes them into a group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimswinder Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 George Simmons wrote: jimswinder wrote: maybe I missing something... but I see him insert a CCD (as a group) and from that CCR he takes Pixels 1, 5, 8, and 11 and makes a group out of them...You ARE missing something - the most important step. Look at it again - he copies/moves those four channels to a different place where they're contiguous and THEN he makes them into a group.well..there's the problem...when you said "Creating a group requires using X number of contiguous channels I thought you meant that to create that group you had to USE contiguous channels (ie Channels 1, 2, 3, 4, etc).... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Simmons Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 Point taken - I'll explain it better next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimswinder Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 George Simmons wrote: Point taken - I'll explain it better next time.and I'll TRY to understand it better!!! lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfing4Dough Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 jimswinder wrote: George Simmons wrote: Point taken - I'll explain it better next time.and I'll TRY to understand it better!!! lolOK, seriously...like that is going to happen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulanator Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 I really appreciate the discussion from the beta folks and giving us some tidbits. I don't feel like I am left out or whatever the crybabies were whining about...On that sample that you had Jeff, I saw a couple more cool features on the left side of the screen: Stretch to fit and repeat to fit, and paste to foreground is right there too. Features like these little ones and the big ones already discussed, are really going to help us out.I am as excited as everyone around here, but honestly, I would rather you folks help get it running great before we get our hands on it. I really appreciate all the work everyone is doing on the new software.And I wish everyone would just stop asking when it is going to be done, and wait patiently, just like we tell the kids. (OK, maybe, "shut the hell up - I told you we are not there yet...)Thanks again staff and beta testers. Attached files Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimswinder Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 Jeff Millard wrote: jimswinder wrote: George Simmons wrote: jimswinder wrote: George Simmons wrote: jimswinder wrote: George Simmons wrote: Will you two get a room or something?!?JeffI'll take "something"... :shock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfing4Dough Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 jimswinder wrote: Jeff Millard wrote: jimswinder wrote: George Simmons wrote: jimswinder wrote: George Simmons wrote: jimswinder wrote: George Simmons wrote: Will you two get a room or something?!?JeffI'll take "something"... :shock:Then I guess you can get the BB award instead:P: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimswinder Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 Surfing4Dough wrote: Then I guess you can get the BB award instead:P:what's a "wat"???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfing4Dough Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 jimswinder wrote: Surfing4Dough wrote: Then I guess you can get the BB award instead:P:what's a "wat"????That is how the cool people say "what" in forums (don't worry, I had to look it up too).However, I also saw this definition too:Short form of "what". Is usually used by people who's synapses fire at a very slow rate. Can be used by otherwise literate people to convey a state of being utterly flabbergasted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimswinder Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 Surfing4Dough wrote:That is how the cool people say "what" in forumswell...good to know I am not cool...that would worry some folks on here!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfing4Dough Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 jimswinder wrote: Surfing4Dough wrote:That is how the cool people say "what" in forumswell...good to know I am not cool...that would worry some folks on here!!! Don't worry, we all already knew that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimswinder Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 Surfing4Dough wrote: Don't worry, we all already knew that. WAT???I mean...what? :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfing4Dough Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 Jeff Millard wrote: Surfing4Dough wrote: Is usually used by people who's synapses fire at a very slow rate.HEY! I'm right here! Again! Why do you keep using my disadvantages as a baseline?!?Jeff Jeff, you will always be "special" to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOR Staff Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 I always thought a Wat was a Buddhist temple complex.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimswinder Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 DevMike wrote: I always thought a Wat was a Buddhist temple complex.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watsounds like someone is a Scrabble player!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOR Staff Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 ...Or someone who's local Wat has the BEST noodles & other Thai food on Sundays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimswinder Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 DevMike wrote: ...Or someone who's local Wat has the BEST noodles & other Thai food on Sundays.lol...why do I hear an Abbot and Costello bit going thru my head??Hey..can I have some of your noodles?Wat Noodles?Those noodles right there? What are they?Wat.Your noodles!!Yes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cenote Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 jimswinder wrote: Hey..can I have some of your noodles?Wat Noodles?Those noodles right there? What are they?Wat.Your noodles!!Yes...I think Jim has lost a noodle or two Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts