dl20415 Posted July 9, 2017 Share Posted July 9, 2017 If I have 2 pixel controllers with the same ids, but one on aux c and one on aux d, would they interfere with one another? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebrown1972 Posted July 9, 2017 Share Posted July 9, 2017 2 hours ago, dl20415 said: If I have 2 pixel controllers with the same ids, but one on aux c and one on aux d, would they interfere with one another? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk No as long as they are on different networks all will work just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dl20415 Posted July 9, 2017 Author Share Posted July 9, 2017 No as long as they are on different networks all will work just fine.Thanks!Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k6ccc Posted July 9, 2017 Share Posted July 9, 2017 As was said, as far as the LOR equipment is concerned, it will work just fine. Just note that it can cause confusion for us human beings. Personally I exclusively use controller IDs of 01 - 0F on the LOR Regular network, controller IDs 11 - 1F on my AuxA network, and controller IDs 21 - 2F on my AuxB network. There is also no need to "fully load" a network either. In my case, my Regular network only has one InputPup on it, The AuxA network has five controllers, and AuxB has three CCP controllers (six unit IDs). AuxB is only used for Christmas, but the other two are used year round. BTW in case you are wondering why I have a separate network for a single InputPup, there is a reason. All of my sequences use intensity files which mandates using enhanced networks. You can't run input devices on an enhanced network. My year round landscape lighting makes extensive use of interactive triggers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Simmons Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 9 hours ago, ebrown1972 said: No as long as they are on different networks all will work just fine. I don't believe they even need to be on separate networks. I've used identical ID's on the same network with standard 16-channel AC controllers. I don't see any reason why pixel controllers would be any different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k6ccc Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, George Simmons said: I don't believe they even need to be on separate networks. I've used identical ID's on the same network with standard 16-channel AC controllers. I don't see any reason why pixel controllers would be any different. That would be true if you are wanting two (or more) controllers to behave exactly the same. I was not assuming that to be the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts