Ebuechner Posted November 20, 2015 Share Posted November 20, 2015 (edited) The only mention of a price on the uAmp in the referenced thread (and that they hadn't actually shipped) was $4 each. So you are spending $4 to avoid using a 30 cent pixel. Other than the uAmp not needing to be accounted for in programming like a null pixel would be in this case, what are you getting for the extra $3.70?Am I missing something here? besides the convenience of not having to program in the null pixel. One of these units can take the place of many null pixels and it looks like it can be installed in line easier. Which in turn would clean up the complexity of the display. Think of it this way less points for failure Edited November 20, 2015 by Ebuechner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now