EmmienLightFan Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 I am going to build a matrix out of WS2812B Strip (7 5m Strips, each cut in half). The matrix will have 1050 pixels.I was going to run it across two outputs of my Pixlite4 controller and have 7 75 pixel strips on each output. I read that the more pixels on each output, the slower the refresh rate. I want the refresh rate as fast as I can get it, and the matrix as smooth as possible.Should I split the matrix up onto all 4 SPI outputs or even put each strip (14 strips, each half of a full 5m strip, so 7 5m strips) on each output or two on each output of my Falcon controller?Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k6ccc Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 I would split it. As a test, I just set an idle output on one of my E6804s to a string of 525 WS2811 pixels to see what the refresh rate is. Came up to 23 refresh cycles per second - or 43 mSec. Since DMX outputs new levels every 23 mSec, half of the updates from LOR will never get sent to the pixels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmmienLightFan Posted January 18, 2016 Author Share Posted January 18, 2016 Ok. Thanks for the test!I will split the matrix accross four outputs on my Pixlite 4, so it will have a dedicated controller, which is probably best. I could use 7 outputs of my Falcon F16. Do you think that there would be a major improvement the more I split it up, or does it reach a point where the pixels refresh faster than LOR can output DMX packets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now