Jump to content

Wav or MP3


Guest Don Gillespie
 Share

Wav or MP3  

11 members have voted

  1. 1. which do you use a Wav file or an MP3 file for your music

    • Wav file
      5
    • MP3 file
      7


Recommended Posts

I only use Wav if I absolutely have to. I've never had any issues with MP3s, and prefer the smaller file sizes. However, I always process them through Audacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only use Wav's.

I have had several problems with mp3's even after running them through Audacity.

And bigger is better. = )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

De Trommelslager

MP3 here. Processed through Audacity. Constant bit rate, blah, blah, blah. So far no issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

George Simmons

I only use Wav if I absolutely have to. I've never had any issues with MP3s, and prefer the smaller file sizes. However, I always process them through Audacity.

I agree.

MP3 here. Processed through Audacity. Constant bit rate, blah, blah, blah. So far no issues.

I agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhh, the tradeoffs... Newer computers shouldn't have a problem with either format (as long as the MP3s are formatted correctly). Older computers on the other hand you may have to experiment:

MP3s are smaller, and therefore are faster to load from disk. However, since they are compressed they require decompression before they can be sent out to the sound card. Decryption = processor load.

WAVs are bigger, so they take a little longer to load from disk. However, since they are uncompressed raw data they need no additional processing before being sent to the sound card.

So, which is your system: IO Bound, or Processor Bound? Older computers usually fared better using WAV over MP3. I remember an old machine I had that would run 50% processor just to play MP3s.

Also, since WAV is uncompressed it has better sound fidelity. Will you hear it? That's a subjective call. I personally can't hear any difference between a CBR 256Kbps MP3 and WAV, but your ear is probably better than mine. But that's only if you rip it from CD or convert from a loss-less codec (say like FLAC). Making a 30 meg WAV out of a 3 minute MP3 that is compressed at 32kbps is still going to sound like an AM radio :)

The one thing WAV will never have is the VBR problem. Bit in=Bit out. No funky compression.

On the other hand, you are talking (on average) 1 Meg/Minute for MP3 vs 10 Meg/Min for WAV. Back in the days when disk space was expensive, that may have pushed you to MP3. Today? Not so much.

The first hard drive I had for a PC was a whopping 32 meg, cost $700, and was about 1/8 of the speed. 2TB of space back then would have cost you $43,750,000. The bank I worked for at the time had the second largest disk farm in New York at just under 9 TB. It took up a couple hundred thousand square feet.

Space? or Fidelity? The choice is yours :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • LORAdmin locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...