Jump to content
Light-O-Rama Forums

I hope this is not true


LORisAwesome

Recommended Posts

Got this when I did a Yahoo search for Light O Rama. I hope this is a mistake. Anyone know anything about this?




Attached files 272736=15068-LOR.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) I highly doubt it.
2) From what I can see on the graphic, that phone number nor address matches up with the current phone/address.
3) Still highly doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ItsMeBobO wrote:

Light-O-Rama is located in South Glen Falls, New York

You could do a little more research before posting.

It has the correct web site, and when I clicked on the "more info" Link it showed Dan@lightorama.com as an email contact.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LORisAwesome wrote:

It has the correct web site, and when I clicked on the "more info" Link it showed Dan@lightorama.com as an email contact.

1) The internet is not 100% correct all of the time.
2) Looks like an old physical address.
3) No need to worry.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don wrote:

LORisAwesome wrote:
It has the correct web site, and when I clicked on the "more info" Link it showed Dan@lightorama.com as an email contact.

1) The internet is not 100% correct all of the time.
2) Looks like an old physical address.
3) No need to worry.


Internet? Not 100% correct all the time? How can this be?

Sorry couldn't resist.

I doubt LOR would have released 3.0 if they were getting ready to close, I mean what's the point right?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BillyTRichVa wrote:

Don wrote:
LORisAwesome wrote:
It has the correct web site, and when I clicked on the "more info" Link it showed Dan@lightorama.com as an email contact.

1) The internet is not 100% correct all of the time.
2) Looks like an old physical address.
3) No need to worry.


Internet? Not 100% correct all the time? How can this be?

Sorry couldn't resist.

I doubt LOR would have released 3.0 if they were getting ready to close, I mean what's the point right?



Good point.

I also thought the LOR might want to know about this so they could try to get it corrected. I know it scared me when I first saw it. I dunno, maybe I should have sent an e-mail to Dan instead of posting on the forums.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don wrote:

1) The internet is not 100% correct all of the time.
2) Looks like an old physical address.
3) No need to worry.


What!!! What I read on the Net might not be true>?!?!?!?!

So you say might not be true which makes the Net 100% true which makes your stament true....

Ahhhhh now I have a head ache!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BillyTRichVa wrote:

I doubt LOR would have released 3.0 if they were getting ready to close, I mean what's the point right?

to make lots and lots of money?? ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...